Skip to content

DSO Conference Wrap-Up

Insights DSO Conference Wrap-Up
Hansen News
Written By

Hansen News

It’s a wrap from the Norwegian DSO conference! 

Hansen had the opportunity to engage with leading energy DSOs from Norway last week, who shared their perspectives on their journey from a traditional utility to a digital service provider. The message from the DSO conference (Nettkonferansen) in Norway was clear: DSOs are becoming the heart of electrification and energy transition. To realise the transition, they recognise customers being a catalyst.

In previous years, the DSO conference has mainly focused on the Smart Meters and technical aspects of maintaining the grid. This year, the tone of voice was very different, with a major focus on the customer and how to create better service and business operations for the generation Z of customers. In my view, the event has grown significantly in terms of the number of attendees, exhibitors and most importantly the ‘energy’ the event generated. This great energy is coming from many directions: Decarbonisation implies an energy transition is on the way.

Statnett (TSO) is predicting that total electricity consumption will increase by 25% from 133 to 166 TWh by 2050 because of ongoing decarbonising of all industries. The increased focus on renewables and local production fundamentally alters how we produce, use, store and trade electricity. This includes more active customers with varying electricity demand, self-generation, small-scale renewable generation, energy storage, power-to-heat and electric vehicles.

DSOs are evolving from a traditional directional value chain to a complex and cohesive energy landscape, transforming the DSO role into a data-driven business. A cool development of something that was considered only interesting for highly specialised engineers! Now we are a part of the mission to save the planet from global heating.

Customers are key to unlock the potential 

DSO front-runners have understood that business model innovation is necessary to cope with the disruptive technology development. They are on the track to re-think and re-organise to act on long-term trends right now.

Being able to use decentralised flexibility sources has strategic importance for the future electricity system. For DSOs, the need for flexibility warrants greater interaction with network customers. This will help garner the significant economic value from an optimised relationship between investments in conventional grid. Now, I can say that I still remember confronting DSOs ahead of the Datahub project, trying to put forward the argument that customers will still be very important for their future service models.

Given the changing energy dynamics, the current model of ‘connect and reinforce’ will need to overcome the passive relationship between the DSO and network customer. Many of the speakers mentioned that future innovation must be based on customer value. Key drivers for the growing importance are things like;
Smart meter interaction, Peak tariffs, EV charge, Social Media, Earth fault, Prosumers, Bus charge, Home Area Network, Voltage level, Connection requests of e.g. of solar panels, etc. According to NVE, we can save as much as NOK 11 billion in the electricity grid by charging electric cars at times of the day when electricity consumption is generally low.

Consolidation initiatives

Not sure if we can refer to it as the “elephant in the room”, but the ongoing discussion after the DSO Conference about how to measure DSO efficiency outlines to some degree that size matters. DSOs are natural monopolies and therefore have a regulated revenue side, where its return is regulated through comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness. Size and scale in operations and procurement, the possibility of continuous bench-marking and the introduction of best practices are thus important competitive factors.

Several demands and regulatory changes are driving the energy industry in the direction of larger and more independent DSO companies. The energy transition requires new competence within digitalisation, therefore we have most certainly not seen the endgame of consolidations.

Hansen’s View

Hansen believes it to be even more important now that DSOs need to look at their business models and decide what role they want to play in the future. Hansen has a lot to say in enabling DSO`s to deliver digital information channels for customers and suppliers, and develop digitised platforms for streamlined customer enquiries, connections and installations.

To unlock the potential of a customer-centric and data-driven business, companies must build an architecture where service innovation becomes the DNA for customer experience. This will create visibility over power flows, loads and connections at the distribution level. Smart grid solutions will enable data visualisation, dispatch simulation and long-term asset optimisation. At the same time, DSOs will need to expand the deployment of sensors across the network to monitor DER (Distributed Energy Resources) at all voltage levels, including remote monitoring, controls and automation of data exchanges.


For a deeper dive into the European DSO market, check out our ‘Energy Transition – Future of DSO’ where we further explore the DSO role in the ongoing energy transition and how together we can address ways to win the new energy customer. 


By Stian Madsen who focuses on guiding utility companies through the ongoing industry transformation, where delivering a personalised energy experience to energy consumers is a key factor.

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.