Skip to content

Breaking Free of the Triple Constraint: The Benefits for CSPs

Insights Breaking Free of the Triple Constraint: The Benefits for CSPs
Hansen News
Written By

Hansen News

What benefits can CSPs expect once they have broken free of the triple constraint?

As the 5G era continues to unfold, it’s becoming clear that Communication Service Providers (CSPs) need to go beyond just offering network connectivity. However, in this current phase where significant investments in 5G have been made but returns are yet to fully materialise, a crucial question arises: ‘What steps do CSPs need to take now to ensure successful 5G monetisation once new applications emerge?’

In the first part of the Hansen Breaking Free of the Triple Constraint to Monetise 5G series, ‘Why CSPs must overcome the triple constraint to effectively monetise 5G’, we explored why CSPs need to move beyond the conventional limits imposed by the framework known as the triple constraint for effective 5G monetisation. We emphasised the importance of adopting more flexible and responsive commercial operations.

Now, we turn our focus to the tangible benefits. This part explores the key advantages CSPs can anticipate as they arm themselves with advanced commercial capabilities. We’re talking about the real game-changers here – the factors that will not only enable CSPs to monetise 5G effectively but also position them as digital service leaders of tomorrow.

Disrupting the Triple Constraint with Modern Business Support Systems

Embracing modern, cloud-native Business Support Systems (BSS) is vital for CSPs aiming to transform into digital service leaders and venture beyond traditional network connectivity.

Modern BSS enable CSPs to adopt more flexible and dynamic operational methods – a foundation for achieving commercial agility. This agility is essential for CSPs to efficiently create, sell, and deliver complex 5G propositions comprised of innovative next-generation products and services in both consumer and enterprise spaces. Crucially, these modern commercial systems can disrupt the traditional triple constraint model of time, scope, and resources.

By streamlining processes and applying automation, CSPs can make these constraints more fluid, enabling the reallocation or optimisation of resources. This flexibility allows for an accelerated time-to-market, expanded scope of offerings, or the redirection of resources towards other strategic areas such as customer insights and market, or competitor research. It’s this level of adaptability that positions a commercially agile CSP to effectively navigate and thrive in the rapidly evolving digital marketplace.

The Benefits to Breaking Free of the Triple Constraint

Streamlining Processes through Automation and Standardisation: Modern BSS can streamline processes by automating routine tasks and standardising complex workflows, affording employees the time to focus on more valuable activities rather than getting bogged down by administrative duties. For CSPs, this means being able to deploy more resources toward strategic initiatives like developing innovative 5G services, rather than being constrained by operational bottlenecks.

Democratising Task Execution: Technology often lowers barriers to entry for executing various tasks. Tools with intuitive user interfaces and embedded intelligence enable a wider range of personnel to undertake tasks that previously required specialised skills. In the context of CSPs, this could mean more team members being able to contribute to the development and rollout of new services, not just those with deep technical expertise. Effectively giving autonomy back to the commercial team and liberating IT from the proposition development process.

Enhancing Collaboration and Accountability: Modern platforms facilitate enhanced collaboration by allowing multiple stakeholders to engage simultaneously. For CSPs, this means more efficient decision-making and alignment, as technology reduces or eliminates the need for cumbersome in-person processes. Matrix organisations benefit greatly as technology provides a common platform for cross-departmental interaction, ensuring that all relevant parties are on the same page.

Reducing Human Error: By standardising processes and introducing automation, made possible by leveraging capabilities such as a common data model, modern BSS significantly reduces the risk of human error –especially useful as propositions become more complex with 5G.

Accelerated Time-to-Market: With streamlined processes, automation, and a reduced dependency on specialised skills, CSPs can expedite the launch of new services. These time efficiencies reduce the risk involved in releasing new market offerings, as any proposition that doesn’t meet expectations can be quickly iterated upon or replaced entirely.

Expanding Scope with Existing Resources: The democratisation of tasks and reduction in manual, repetitive work empowers CSPs to undertake more complex and ambitious projects without necessarily increasing resource input. This means that the same team that previously managed contemporary service offerings can now handle more intricate and sophisticated 5G propositions, enhancing the company’s competitive edge.

Strategic Reinvestment of Time: The time saved through technological efficiencies opens opportunities for CSPs to invest in areas that drive long-term growth. This could involve deeper customer research, developing more customer-centric propositions, or exploring innovative applications of 5G technology. Such strategic reinvestment ensures that CSPs are not just keeping pace with the market but actively shaping it.

Combining Speed and Complexity: Perhaps the most significant benefit is the potential for CSPs to simultaneously increase both the speed and complexity of their service offerings. Advanced technology could enable them to launch more sophisticated services in a shorter timeframe than what was required for simpler, previous-generation services. This dual advantage is crucial in an industry where speed and innovation are key determinants of market leadership.

MOVING BEYOND THE TRADITIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIMITATIONS

Disrupting the triple constraint is about more than just changing operational methods for CSPs, it’s a fundamental shift in how they redefine their market offerings and increase value to customers, all while effectively managing risk. By moving beyond traditional project management limitations, CSPs can unlock significant efficiency gains. These gains not only make new offerings less risky but also provide a robust platform for expansion and the opportunity to venture beyond basic network services.

The real game-changer occurs when a CSP can introduce a new offering to the market without excessive investment in resources or time. This capability is key to enabling effective and efficient experimentation with new market offerings. It positions CSPs to rapidly respond to market needs and customer preferences, fostering an environment where innovation thrives, and new opportunities are continually explored and capitalised upon.

Next, watch for the final blog in this Hansen mini-series where we showcase how Hansen applications enable CSPs to achieve the commercial agility needed to break free of the triple constraint and build the foundation required now, ahead of next-generation 5G applications coming to fruition.

Bruce Williams
Product Marketing Manager
The Hansen Suite for Communications, Technology & Media

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.